Scope and read
We agree the accounts in scope and the questions worth answering, then read the configuration as it actually is rather than as the diagram says.
Practice 01 — Cloud Security
Most cloud incidents are a configuration decision made months earlier by someone solving a different problem. We make those decisions with you, write them down, and then try to get past them.
Scoped on the call, quoted in days, in writing.
A short call to understand what you run and what you need to be sure of, and to explain how we would approach it.
Loading available times…
We agree the accounts in scope and the questions worth answering, then read the configuration as it actually is rather than as the diagram says.
Findings come with the reproduction steps that produced them. An escalation path is shown as a sequence of calls, not a severity rating.
A findings register with named owners and a 90-day order of work, arranged so the changes that shrink blast radius land first.
Read-only access to the accounts in scope, through a role you create and can revoke. Offensive testing runs against what you authorise in writing, and we do not hold credentials after an engagement closes.
No. Scanners are a starting point and we use them, but the deliverable is the paths we could actually walk — which role reached which data, and the calls that got us there.
The method does; the benchmarks differ. CIS publishes equivalents for Azure and GCP, and most of the work — identity, isolation, logging, blast radius — is the same shape. Tell us what you run and we will say honestly how much carries over.
No. Your engineers make the changes; we design them, document them and verify them afterwards. We do not operate client production systems.
Thirty minutes, no obligation. We will tell you what is worth doing, including when the answer is less than you expected.